Review Assessment Report
Part 1: Contact & Program Identification
Report Year and Contact Information | ||
---|---|---|
Academic Year | Modified By | Date Modified |
2020-2021 | [email protected] | 2021-11-19T21:13:06.469Z |
School | Name of Program | Courses |
---|---|---|
CHSS | NATV Humanities Gen Ed | NATV 1150 |
Part 2: Program Summary
Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program |
---|
As noted on the next section of the report, NATV performed very well and showed little impact with the move to online classes. |
Part 3: Data Review
2018-2019 | 2019-2020 | 2020-2021 | |
---|---|---|---|
Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Number of declared majors | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Average Class Size | 28 | 30 | 28.8 |
Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%) | 7% | 0% | 9% |
Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above | 79% | 100% | 77% |
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year | 90% | 97% | 93% |
Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schools | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section | 100% | 100% | 40% |
Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above |
---|
These courses met all three relevant targets, including a very high retention rate and pass rate for the courses. |
Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis
Learning Outcome | Population or Course(s) Assessed | Description | Summary of Assessment Results |
---|---|---|---|
1. Critical Thinking | NATV 1150 |
| Students were assessed in the critical thinking essential skill area and its four sub-skills: Problem Setting, Evidence Acquisition, Evidence Evaluation, and Reasoning conclusion through the use of a standardized writing prompt for Social and Behavioral Science classes. |
Interpretation of Assessment findings |
---|
The primary take away from the assessment findings is that roughly two thirds of students tested at proficient in Problem Setting and Evidence Acquisition, but those numbers dropped into the 50th percentiles for Evidence Evaluation and Reasoning/Conclusion. While all of these numbers show a majority of students passing, the results do suggest the latter two skills are weaker areas that will likely require more attention moving forward. It should also be noted that the CHSS Assessment Team (CAT) has made changes to the prompt and will be assessing critical thinking again in Spring 2022 to align with the Assessment Academy's focus on Thinking in Action. |
Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)
Upcoming Year | Changes Planned for the upcoming year | Data Motivating this change |
---|---|---|
2021-2022 | The CAT prompt has been revised but will still feature the same type of assessment measure. | This is part of an ongoing process of refining the prompt as a result of faculty feedback. |
2021-2022 | ||
2021-2022 |