Review Assessment Report

Part 1: Contact & Program Identification

Report Year and Contact Information
Academic YearModified ByDate Modified
2020-2021[email protected]2021-11-19T21:13:06.469Z
SchoolName of ProgramCourses
CHSSNATV Humanities Gen EdNATV 1150

Part 2: Program Summary

Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program
As noted on the next section of the report, NATV performed very well and showed little impact with the move to online classes.

Part 3: Data Review

2018-20192019-20202020-2021
Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10n/an/an/a
Number of declared majorsn/an/an/a
Average Class Size283028.8
Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%)7%0%9%
Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above79%100%77%
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year90%97%93%
Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schoolsn/an/an/a
Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section100%100%40%
Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above
These courses met all three relevant targets, including a very high retention rate and pass rate for the courses.

Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis

Learning OutcomePopulation or Course(s) AssessedDescriptionSummary of Assessment Results
1. Critical Thinking
NATV 1150
  • In-class Writing Assignment
Students were assessed in the critical thinking essential skill area and its four sub-skills: Problem Setting, Evidence Acquisition, Evidence Evaluation, and Reasoning conclusion through the use of a standardized writing prompt for Social and Behavioral Science classes.
Interpretation of Assessment findings
The primary take away from the assessment findings is that roughly two thirds of students tested at proficient in Problem Setting and Evidence Acquisition, but those numbers dropped into the 50th percentiles for Evidence Evaluation and Reasoning/Conclusion. While all of these numbers show a majority of students passing, the results do suggest the latter two skills are weaker areas that will likely require more attention moving forward. It should also be noted that the CHSS Assessment Team (CAT) has made changes to the prompt and will be assessing critical thinking again in Spring 2022 to align with the Assessment Academy's focus on Thinking in Action.

Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)

Upcoming YearChanges Planned for the upcoming yearData Motivating this change
2021-2022
The CAT prompt has been revised but will still feature the same type of assessment measure.
This is part of an ongoing process of refining the prompt as a result of faculty feedback.
2021-2022
2021-2022
Please select all of the following that characterize the types of changes described in the above action plan
2021-2024 CNM - Digital Services
Site version v1.0.62 built at 2024-02-01T17:31:19.000Z