Review Assessment Report

Part 1: Contact & Program Identification

Report Year and Contact Information
Academic YearModified ByDate Modified
2020-2021jbeltran6@cnm.edu2021-11-16T20:10:59.158Z
SchoolName of ProgramCourses
ATGeographic Information Technology AAS DegreeGIS 1008,GIS 1118,BCIS 1110,GIS 2008,GIS 2228,GIS 1005,CIS 2520,GIS 1002,SUR 1002,SUR 2205,MATH 1350,GEOG 2110,GEOG 1110,GIS 2011,GIS 2030,CAD 1001,GIS 2020,CIS 1250

Part 2: Program Summary

Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program
Program has had mixed success with the pandemic. Enrollment in lower-end courses has been steady or even up but overall cohorts are small and enrollment in upper level courses has been down.

Part 3: Data Review

2018-20192019-20202020-2021
Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 103510
Number of declared majors343438
Average Class Size23.922.721.3
Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%)13%17%17%
Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above72%68%65%
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year80%78%76%
Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schoolsn/an/an/a
Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section43%48%51%
Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above
Average fill rate = 76% Retention rate = 83% C-pass rate = 65% # of grads = 10 Our program is exceeding all major targets. Our c-pass rate could be higher.

Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis

Learning OutcomePopulation or Course(s) AssessedDescriptionSummary of Assessment Results
1. Communicate results of GIS-based research to technical and non-technical audiences.
GIS 1118 (GIS 1001)
  • Class Project
SPR 21 - 71% of students passed their final project satisfactorily. some students did not turn in this project at all due to lack of participation in the course at all for the last few weeks.
Interpretation of Assessment findings
Those students that did submit a final project passed said project with an average of an 'A' score. Some students did not submit said project.

Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)

Upcoming YearChanges Planned for the upcoming yearData Motivating this change
2021-2022
Ensure more focus on complete of course and final project. As noted, some students 'fell off' towards the end of the term and thus did not even complete the final project.
71% pass rate for this project.
2021-2022
2021-2022
Please select all of the following that characterize the types of changes described in the above action plan
2021-2024 CNM - Digital Services
Site version v1.0.62 built at 2024-02-01T17:31:19.000Z