Review Assessment Report

Part 1: Contact & Program Identification

Report Year and Contact Information
Academic YearModified ByDate Modified
2020-2021[email protected]2021-12-07T20:27:52.311Z
SchoolName of ProgramCourses
CHSSHUMN Humanities Gen EdHUMN 1105,HUMN 1110,HUMN 2110

Part 2: Program Summary

Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program
HUMN showed little negative impact from the move to fully online courses last year.

Part 3: Data Review

2018-20192019-20202020-2021
Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10n/an/an/a
Number of declared majorsn/an/an/a
Average Class Size24.925.922.9
Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%)9%8%4%
Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above69%67%80%
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year79%80%71%
Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schoolsn/an/an/a
Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section12%8%20%
Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above
Humanities exceeded all three targets this last school year.

Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis

Learning OutcomePopulation or Course(s) AssessedDescriptionSummary of Assessment Results
Communication (PLO)
HUMN 1110, HUMN 2110RELG 1110
    Critical Thinking (Gen Ed & PLO)
    HUMN 1110, HUMN 2110RELG 1110
      Information and Digital Literacy (Gen Ed)
      HUMN 1110, HUMN 2110RELG 1110
        Personal & Social Responsibility (Gen Ed)
        HUMN 1110, HUMN 2110RELG 1110
          Interpretation of Assessment findings
          The primary take away from the assessment findings is that roughly two thirds of students tested at proficient in Problem Setting and Evidence Acquisition, but those numbers dropped into the 50th percentiles for Evidence Evaluation and Reasoning/Conclusion. While all of these numbers show a majority of students passing, the results do suggest the latter two skills are weaker areas that will likely require more attention moving forward. It should also be noted that the CHSS Assessment Team (CAT) has made changes to the prompt and will be assessing critical thinking again in Spring 2022 to align with the Assessment Academy's focus on Thinking in Action.

          Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)

          Upcoming YearChanges Planned for the upcoming yearData Motivating this change
          2021-2022
          The CAT prompt has been revised but will still feature the same type of assessment measure.
          This is part of an ongoing process of refining the prompt as a result of faculty feedback.
          2021-2022
          2021-2022
          Please select all of the following that characterize the types of changes described in the above action plan
          2021-2024 CNM - Digital Services
          Site version v1.0.62 built at 2024-02-01T17:31:19.000Z