Review Assessment Report
Part 1: Contact & Program Identification
| Report Year and Contact Information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Academic Year | Modified By | Date Modified |
| 2021-2022 | seitz@cnm.edu | 2022-11-10T02:41:13.379Z |
| School | Name of Program | Courses |
|---|---|---|
| CHSS | SOCI Social Behavioral Gen Ed | SOCI 1110,SOCI 2120,SOCI 2210,SOCI 2220,SOCI 2240,SOCI 2250,SOCI 2310,SOCI 2330,SOCI 2340 |
Part 2: Program Summary
| Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program |
|---|
Part 3: Data Review
| 2019-2020 | 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Number of declared majors | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Average Class Size | 26.6 | 25.1 | 23.5 |
| Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%) | 14% | 14% | 12% |
| Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above | 69% | 66% | 69% |
| Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year | 86% | 82% | 76% |
| Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schools | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section | 65% | 76% | 32% |
| Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above |
|---|
Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis
| Learning Outcome | Population or Course(s) Assessed | Description | Summary of Assessment Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| COMMUNICATION | SOCI 2120SOCI 2250SOCI 2340 | ||
| CRITICAL THINKING | SOCI 2120SOCI 2250SOCI 2340 | ||
| PERSONAL & SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY | SOCI 2120SOCI 2250SOCI 2340 |
| Interpretation of Assessment findings |
|---|
Students in SOCI 2120 (n=15) completed a short writing assignment to measure critical thinking skills. The class demonstrated good skills for the following rubric criteria with more than 60% scoring as proficient or exemplary: problem setting, evidence acquisition, evidence evaluation. The reasoning/conclusion was more challenging with 46% of students attaining a proficient or exemplary score. The correlation with the critical thinking total score and students' GPA for the semester was quite healthy at .52, but the correlation with total credit hours is weak at .11.
|
Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)
| Upcoming Year | Changes Planned for the upcoming year | Data Motivating this change |
|---|---|---|
| 2021-2022 | ||
| 2021-2022 | ||
| 2021-2022 |