Review Assessment Report

Part 1: Contact & Program Identification

Report Year and Contact Information
Academic YearModified ByDate Modified
2021-2022[email protected]2022-11-07T03:18:01.310Z
SchoolName of ProgramCourses
CHSSCriminology AA DegreeBCIS 1110,ENGL 1120,SOCI 1110,SOCI 2210,SOCI 2310

Part 2: Program Summary

Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program
The department graduated 68 students in 2021-22. The department has a strong tradition of inviting prospective graduates to an informal, on-campus reception. Because we were unable to meet in person, we created a short video and card/flyer to recognize and congratulate our graduates in fall and spring semesters. We offered five online events for students to meet faculty and scholars through the Sociology Speaker Series in spring 2021. Participation ranged from 20 to 50-ish students. The Criminology and Sociology Student Club continued to engage students and survived the campus shutdown via virtual meetings. The club met in two-week intervals and students, plus the advisor, talk via Slack. The club’s inaugural gathering for fall 2022 is in October. In addition, the department participated in the Major Mixer via Zoom in fall 2021 and staffed a table for College Day in spring 2022. We enjoy good rapport and collegial decision-making in the department. It is a program highlight as well!

Part 3: Data Review

2019-20202020-20212021-2022
Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10807368
Number of declared majors491470462
Average Class Size22.421.419.9
Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%)14%13%13%
Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above72%69%69%
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year82%80%75%
Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schools51%n/an/a
Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section46%49%18%
Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above
The program met the target measures for 2021-2022. The data for full-time faculty coverage by section for 2021-22 is suspect and we ask the Office of Data Strategy to verify the reported percentage.

Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis

Learning OutcomePopulation or Course(s) AssessedDescriptionSummary of Assessment Results
1. Critical Analysis
SOCI 1110 In spring 2022 the department implemented an assessment in the 1110 classes and one 2000-level section. The strategy was comparable to that used in the capstone class; the rationale was to review the starting point for our students. We can thus gauge the skills of 1110 students vis-à-vis those of students close to graduation. The capstone results are from 2020-21 and although the capstone students were asked to analyze a more rigorous journal article the two assessment efforts are sufficient for a rough appraisal of student progress. The 1110 assignment was an analysis of an 4-7 page article that summarized sociological research and included data analysis. The assignment was included in the calculation of the course grade, not extra credit. The reports consisted of short answer questions and were scored by the instructor in the section. The rubrics for critical analysis and effective communication were employed. A pre-test was conducted in fall 2021.
  • Homework Assignments
Tables 1-3 (not shown) highlight the results of the spring 2022 assessment. More than 50% of students achieved the “did it” or “did it great” level for critical analysis. The correlation analysis suggests strong relations between the 4 rubric dimensions, i.e., students who do well with problem identification also do well with conclusions. Correlations for students’ grade in the 1110 course (table 3) are less robust—ranging from .39 to .47—but are stronger than those for the rubric dimensions and total hours completed (from .05 to .15). Results for two cohorts of students were analyzed: 1110 in spring 2022 and capstone (2999) in spring 2021. The analysis represents a synthetic cohort. Notably, the majors did not score as “absent or incorrect” for the rubric dimensions compared to 10% for 1110. A higher percentage of the majors scored “did it great” than the 1110 students with the exception of evidence and evidence evaluation; the percentages of 1110 and CRIM students are comparable for these skills.
2. Effective Communication
SOCI 1110
    Interpretation of Assessment findings
    One explanation for the higher scores for 1110 students is that CRIM students in the capstone class selected their articles for the assignment. The articles were not always rigorous and not as applicable to the rubric categories as the instructor-selected articles for the 1110 assessment.

    Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)

    Upcoming YearChanges Planned for the upcoming yearData Motivating this change
    2021-2022
    2021-2022
    2021-2022
    Please select all of the following that characterize the types of changes described in the above action plan
    2021-2024 CNM - Digital Services
    Site version v1.0.62 built at 2024-02-01T17:31:19.000Z