Review Assessment Report
Part 1: Contact & Program Identification
| Report Year and Contact Information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Academic Year | Modified By | Date Modified |
| 2021-2022 | jbeltran6@cnm.edu | 2022-09-22T21:40:10.469Z |
| School | Name of Program | Courses |
|---|---|---|
| AT | Geographic Information Technology AAS Degree | BCIS 1110,CAD 1001,CIS 1250,CIS 2520,GEOG 1110,GEOG 2110,GIS 1002,GIS 1005,GIS 1008,GIS 1118,GIS 2008,GIS 2011,GIS 2020,GIS 2030,GIS 2228,MATH 1350,SUR 1002,SUR 2205 |
Part 2: Program Summary
| Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program |
|---|
This program provides spatial analysis training, including knowledge of spatial data types and formats, analysis techniques and visualization methods.
The program has experienced a small dip in enrollment, upon return to in-person lab time. However, students are better able to grasp the workings of our software from the in-person work.
Increasing enrollment will be an ongoing effort. |
Part 3: Data Review
| 2019-2020 | 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10 | 5 | 10 | 4 |
| Number of declared majors | 34 | 38 | 44 |
| Average Class Size | 22.7 | 21.3 | 20.1 |
| Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%) | 17% | 17% | 16% |
| Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above | 68% | 65% | 65% |
| Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year | 78% | 76% | 71% |
| Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schools | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section | 48% | 51% | 20% |
| Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above |
|---|
low # of graduate awards partially due to pandemic conditions. We also have fewer students pursuing the full AAS in favor of the certificate. |
Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis
| Learning Outcome | Population or Course(s) Assessed | Description | Summary of Assessment Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Communicate results of GIS-based research to technical and non-technical audiences. | GIS 2008 |
| 10/11 students received an 'A' on their final field mapping project. The project is graded entirely on the content of their project poster/layout. The results indicate a high rate of successfully meeting the LO. |
| Interpretation of Assessment findings |
|---|
The results indicate that students in the course are successfully meeting/achieving the learning outcome. |
Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)
| Upcoming Year | Changes Planned for the upcoming year | Data Motivating this change |
|---|---|---|
| 2021-2022 | No changes noted for this particular LO. | data indicates current course success. |
| 2021-2022 | ||
| 2021-2022 |