Review Assessment Report
Part 1: Contact & Program Identification
Report Year and Contact Information | ||
---|---|---|
Academic Year | Modified By | Date Modified |
2021-2022 | [email protected] | 2022-11-17T18:10:54.788Z |
School | Name of Program | Courses |
---|---|---|
AT | ARTS Creative Fine Arts Gen Ed | ARTS 1240,ARTS 1250,ARTS 1610 |
Part 2: Program Summary
Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program |
---|
In Spring 22 Art studio courses were for the first time offered in new facilities which created instructional adjustments and challenges. Art studio course are also creative art making courses that involve the physical construction of artworks. Critical thinking and communication is demonstrated through the drawing or design process and through the critique process, which is verbal and conversational. The assessment process developed and administered through CAT has students respond to a written prompt with an essay. This form of assessment does not reflect the mode with which our students use these outcomes in our studio environment. Also the assessment was administered through Microsoft forms which does not notify faculty if their students have completed the assessment or give faculty the actual submissions. I think this procedure is problematic. |
Part 3: Data Review
2019-2020 | 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | |
---|---|---|---|
Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Number of declared majors | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Average Class Size | 16.7 | 16.5 | 15.5 |
Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%) | 13% | 19% | 19% |
Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above | 74% | 62% | 68% |
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year | 86% | 82% | 80% |
Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schools | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section | 31% | 33% | 19% |
Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above |
---|
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity - Met and exceeded fill rate
Annual retention rate is 70% or above (SAGE 65%) - Our retention rate stayed steady from following year
Annual C-pass rate for coursework is 60% or above - The C-pass rate increased by 6% from the following year
Annual number of graduates is greater than 10 (for degree and certificate programs only- N/A |
Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis
Learning Outcome | Population or Course(s) Assessed | Description | Summary of Assessment Results |
---|---|---|---|
Communication (PLO) | ARTS 1250, 1610 |
| |
Critical Thinking (Gen Ed & PLO) | ARTS 1250, 1610 |
| |
Personal & Social Responsibility (Gen Ed) | ARTS 1250, 1610 |
|
Interpretation of Assessment findings |
---|
Results for students (n=179) in Creative and Fine Arts (CFA) classes demonstrated strong skills for problem identification in the spring assessment, with more than 70% scoring as developing or proficient. But less than 50% of CFA students attained developing or proficient scores for the other critical thinking dimensions. That said, the four critical thinking dimensions show moderate to strong correlations.
CAT's assessment process and data does not give meaningful and practical information that can be applied to the curriculum in these hands on studio courses. A more appropriate process needs to be developed in order to generate data that will be easier for us in the art department to understand and use. |
Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)
Upcoming Year | Changes Planned for the upcoming year | Data Motivating this change |
---|---|---|
2021-2022 | For the upcoming year, we will work on developing a meaningful assessment process that will be more appropriate for the art studio learning environment and curriculum. | Data gathered is difficult for faculty to understand and therefore use as a guide for change. |
2021-2022 | For the upcoming year, we will work on developing a meaningful assessment process that will be more appropriate for the art studio learning environment and curriculum. | Data gathered is difficult for faculty to understand and therefore use as a guide for change. |
2021-2022 | For the upcoming year, we will work on developing a meaningful assessment process that will be more appropriate for the art studio learning environment and curriculum. | Data gathered is difficult for faculty to understand and therefore use as a guide for change. |