Review Assessment Report

Part 1: Contact & Program Identification

Report Year and Contact Information
Academic YearModified ByDate Modified
2021-2022[email protected]2022-10-14T18:24:22.138Z
SchoolName of ProgramCourses
MSEGEOL Science Gen EdGEOL 1110,GEOL 1110L,GEOL 2110,GEOL 2110L

Part 2: Program Summary

Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program
The Geology program continues to operate smoothly with repeated successes and highlights seen in previous years. Some of these include scholarships to professional meetings, book awards, and professional publications and presentations by some students. We are working to make the requirements for obtaining an associate's degree more efficient.

Part 3: Data Review

2019-20202020-20212021-2022
Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10n/an/an/a
Number of declared majorsn/an/an/a
Average Class Size21.522.920.8
Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%)15%17%15%
Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above73%73%77%
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year67%80%68%
Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schoolsn/an/an/a
Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section41%41%18%
Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above
The annual number of graduates is low. This biggest hurdle has been the math requirements. We are working to make these more flexible. The number of declared majors is slightly down. Making the math requirements more flexible and adding some additional program-approved electives may help with this. There are not data for most of the targets listed above, but some of our results may suggest a change in teaching approach.

Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis

Learning OutcomePopulation or Course(s) AssessedDescriptionSummary of Assessment Results
ES Personal & Social Responsibility: sustainability and the natural and human worlds.
1110 or 1101L2110 or 2110L
    Interpretation of Assessment findings
    This LO was measured with 2 separate questions. The first was a 3-part groundwater pollution problem. The second question dealt with human influence on weathering rates. Results: Results #1 (Fall 2021) • Number of students 20; number of correct answers 15; % correct 75 • Number of students 20; number of correct answers 17; %correct 85 • Number of students 20; number of correct answers 15; %correct 75 Results #1 (Spring 2022) • Number of students 33; number of correct answers 28; % correct 85 • Number of students 33; number of correct answers 19; % correct 58 • Number of students 33; number of correct answers 16; % correct 48 Results #2 (Fall 2021) • Number of students 18; number of correct answers 8; % correct 44 Results #2 (Spring 2022) • Number of students 71; number of correct answers 48; % correct 68 Some scores indicate concept mastery; others suggest more attention in the classroom.

    Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)

    Upcoming YearChanges Planned for the upcoming yearData Motivating this change
    2021-2022
    2021-2022
    2021-2022
    Please select all of the following that characterize the types of changes described in the above action plan
    2021-2024 CNM - Digital Services
    Site version v1.0.62 built at 2024-02-01T17:31:19.000Z