Review Assessment Report
Part 1: Contact & Program Identification
Report Year and Contact Information | ||
---|---|---|
Academic Year | Modified By | Date Modified |
2021-2022 | [email protected] | 2022-10-18T20:58:42.710Z |
School | Name of Program | Courses |
---|---|---|
HWPS | Phlebotomy Certificate | HLTH 1001,MLT 1001,PHLB 1010,PHLB 1090,PHLB 1092 |
Part 2: Program Summary
Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program |
---|
High demand from students and community, courses filled quickly during registration period. Clinical partners reached out to speak with students earlier about job opportunities. Primary program challenge has been meeting supply need to maintain our level of hands-on activities due to nationwide shortages and limitations. |
Part 3: Data Review
2019-2020 | 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | |
---|---|---|---|
Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10 | 59 | 60 | 80 |
Number of declared majors | 84 | 105 | 112 |
Average Class Size | 24.6 | 21.5 | 21.1 |
Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%) | 8% | 8% | 8% |
Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above | 87% | 86% | 85% |
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year | 85% | 82% | 78% |
Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schools | 5% | n/a | n/a |
Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section | 43% | 34% | 14% |
Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above |
---|
The Phlebotomy program has met all targets. Increase in graduates and declared majors following smaller classed due to COVID pandemic. Students continue to achieve a high pass rate. Program is consistent and continues to support community needs. |
Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis
Learning Outcome | Population or Course(s) Assessed | Description | Summary of Assessment Results |
---|---|---|---|
1. Describe and demonstrate appropriate laboratory etiquette, professionalism, communication and human relation skills. | MLT 1001 and PHLB 1090 |
| Criteria: Professionalism Paper
Mean score <71%= unacceptable, action plan required
Mean score >71%= acceptable, no action plan needed
Average: 89.3%
Criteria: Clinical Performance Preceptor Evaluations
Mean score <71%= unacceptable, action plan required
Mean score >71%= acceptable, no action plan needed
Average: 97.6% |
2. Describe and identify pre-analytical variables and interferences related to laboratory specimen collection and handling and correlate laboratory tests with basic human physiology and disease states. | PHLB 1010 and ASCP PBT National Exam |
| Criteria: PHLB 1010 comprehensive final exam
Mean score <71%= unacceptable, action plan required
Mean score >71%= acceptable, no action plan needed
Average Score: 86.7%
Criteria: ASCP PHLB scores
Mean score <400= unacceptable, action plan required
Mean score >400= acceptable, no action plan needed
Average Score: 617 |
3. Perform laboratory procedures including: specimen collection and processing, record documentation, pre-analytical preventative and corrective action, and safety protocols. | PHLB 1092 and PHLB 1090 |
| Criteria: Lab practical exam and final draw scores
Mean score <71%= unacceptable, action plan required
Mean score >71%= acceptable, no action plan needed
Average: 85.9%
Criteria: Clinical Performance Instructor Evaluations
Mean score <71%= unacceptable ,action plan required
Mean score >71%= acceptable, no action plan needed
Average: 96.7% |
Interpretation of Assessment findings |
---|
Knowledge: Students are meeting and exceeding the minimum criteria. The final comprehensive exam is maintaining a greater than C average. All students who took the ASCP exam passed with scores higher than the previous year.
Skills: Students are meeting and exceeding the minimum criteria. The lab practicum and final draw scores are maintaining a greater than C average. Student performance in clinical sites is maintaining a greater than C average.
Behavior: Students are meeting and exceeding the minimum criteria. The professionalism paper indicates students have an understanding of what it means to succeed and display professionalism. Clinical preceptor evaluations indicate students are displaying professionalism in at the clinical sites. |
Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)
Upcoming Year | Changes Planned for the upcoming year | Data Motivating this change |
---|---|---|
2021-2022 | ||
2021-2022 | ||
2021-2022 |