Review Assessment Report
Part 1: Contact & Program Identification
Report Year and Contact Information | ||
---|---|---|
Academic Year | Modified By | Date Modified |
2021-2022 | [email protected] | 2022-10-11T22:44:11.415Z |
School | Name of Program | Courses |
---|---|---|
AT | Aviation Maintenance Technology Degree | AVMT 1005,AVMT 1010,AVMT 1015,AVMT 1020,AVMT 1025,AVMT 1105,AVMT 1110,AVMT 1115,AVMT 1120,AVMT 1125,AVMT 1130,AVMT 1135,AVMT 1140,AVMT 1145,AVMT 1305,AVMT 1310,AVMT 1315,AVMT 1320,AVMT 1325,AVMT 1330,AVMT 1335,AVMT 1340,AVMT 1345,BCIS 1110 |
Part 2: Program Summary
Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program |
---|
The program in this cycle is in recovery from low enrollment during COVID. The cohorts who make up these groups registered in 2020 and 2021. Here is an overview of the numbers.
General: 15 students enrolled in the Fall of 2021. 11 out 15 students passed the General Curriculum. Two students did not return to continue the program. due to
complications.
Airframe: 8/9 Airframe students from the General group completed the Airframe Certificate. One student did not pass since he missed a class due to COVID.
Powerplant: 6/7 Students completed the Powerplant Certificate.
Employment: Local Employers contacted CNM AVMT looking for technicians including Bode Aviation, AerSale Landing Gear Solutions, New Mexico Aero, Robert Mudd in Moriarity, etc. National employers include American Airlines and Skywest Airlines who both contacted us for recruitment.
Boeing published an employment outlook report which stated Aviation Maintenance is an above average growth trend for the next 15 years. |
Part 3: Data Review
2019-2020 | 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | |
---|---|---|---|
Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10 | 8 | 6 | 9 |
Number of declared majors | 103 | 62 | 57 |
Average Class Size | 22 | 20.1 | 18.5 |
Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%) | 14% | 11% | 10% |
Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above | 74% | 72% | 70% |
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year | 75% | 75% | 68% |
Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schools | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section | 49% | 59% | 21% |
Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above |
---|
9 is the number of students who earned the Associate's Degree in this cycle. This was up from the previous year. |
Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis
Learning Outcome | Population or Course(s) Assessed | Description | Summary of Assessment Results |
---|---|---|---|
1. Demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge of basic facts, principle, theories and concepts. | General Curriculum
Airframe Certificate
Powerplant Certificate
|
| 8 out 8 students passed the General Written Exam with the FAA. The average grade was above the national average at 87%.
4 out 4 students passed the Airframe Written Exam with the FAA. The average grade was above the National Average at 85%
1 student passed the Powerplant Written Exam with the FAA. The FAA did not published the third quarter results from the SU22 term. |
1. Demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge of basic facts, principle, theories and concepts. | General Curriculum
Airframe Certificate
Powerplant Certificate
|
| 8 out 8 students passed the General Written Exam with the FAA. The average grade was above the national average at 87%.
4 out 4 students passed the Airframe Written Exam with the FAA. The average grade was above the National Average at 85%
1 student passed the Powerplant Written Exam with the FAA. The FAA did not published the third quarter results from the SU22 term. |
1. Demonstrate the ability to apply knowledge of basic facts, principle, theories and concepts. | General Curriculum
Airframe Certificate
Powerplant Certificate
|
| 8 out 8 students passed the General Written Exam with the FAA. The average grade was above the national average at 87%.
4 out 4 students passed the Airframe Written Exam with the FAA. The average grade was above the National Average at 85%
1 student passed the Powerplant Written Exam with the FAA. The FAA did not published the third quarter results from the SU22 term. |
Interpretation of Assessment findings |
---|
Our students performed above the National Average with the FAA Exams. Less students tested with the FAA due to lower enrollment from COVID. |
Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)
Upcoming Year | Changes Planned for the upcoming year | Data Motivating this change |
---|---|---|
2021-2022 | Curricular Revision | The next cycle will have revised curriculum due to a regulatory change. The new curriculum will align with the Airmen Certification Standards. |
2021-2022 | Assessment Criteria Revision | In the next cycle the FAA will publish more data as a result of a regulatory change and the testing will change too in Summer 2023. |
2021-2022 | Faculty Training and Development | The FAA Instructor's Handbook 8083-9A is an excellent resource for referencing best instructor and testing practices. |