Review Assessment Report

Part 1: Contact & Program Identification

Report Year and Contact Information
Academic Year	Modified By	Date Modified
2021-2022	[email protected]	2022-10-13T23:22:42.504Z

School	Name of Program	Courses
ED	Teacher Education AA Degree: Secondary Education	EDUC 1120,ENGL 1120

Part 2: Program Summary

Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program
The AA in Elementary/Special Education has been consistent since 2018 when it was restructured. In 2021-2022, there were 208 declared majors and 16 graduates in the program. For declared majors this was an 8% drop form 2020-21, and 7% higher for graduates. Course fill rates and retention rates were above 80% and C-Pass rate was above 70%. This was coming out of the pandemic when all courses online and F2F. These concentrations within the degree allow students to specialize with 12 courses in their content areas in addition to the teacher education coursework. Faculty revised curriculum to ensure the course learning objectives are aligned to the summative tasks for each class. Online consensus shells and master syllabi have been maintained for consistency in these LOs and summative assignments.

Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program

The AA in Elementary/Special Education has been consistent since 2018 when it was restructured. In 2021-2022, there were 208 declared majors and 16 graduates in the program. For declared majors this was an 8% drop form 2020-21, and 7% higher for graduates. Course fill rates and retention rates were above 80% and C-Pass rate was above 70%. This was coming out of the pandemic when all courses online and F2F. These concentrations within the degree allow students to specialize with 12 courses in their content areas in addition to the teacher education coursework. Faculty revised curriculum to ensure the course learning objectives are aligned to the summative tasks for each class. Online consensus shells and master syllabi have been maintained for consistency in these LOs and summative assignments.

Part 3: Data Review

	2019-2020	2020-2021	2021-2022
Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10	11	15	16
Number of declared majors	219	224	208
Average Class Size	19.2	17.9	17.1
Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%)	15%	14%	15%
Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above	74%	72%	71%
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year	87%	82%	78%
Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schools	64%	n/a	n/a
Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section	38%	29%	11%

Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above
As the data show, our program has met or exceeded all targets set by the college. For 2021-2022, we graduated 16 students, which shows a slight increase from the previous year. This is notable because most of these grads would have started at or near the beginning of the pandemic. Our C-pass rate was at 71%, above the 60% target. Our annual retention rate as informed by the annual withdrawal rate data is well above the 70% threshold. The average class fill rate for 2021-2022 was at 78%. Most notable is the full-time faculty coverage by section. At 11%, this is far below previous levels and reflects the need for more FT faculty.

Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above

As the data show, our program has met or exceeded all targets set by the college. For 2021-2022, we graduated 16 students, which shows a slight increase from the previous year. This is notable because most of these grads would have started at or near the beginning of the pandemic. Our C-pass rate was at 71%, above the 60% target. Our annual retention rate as informed by the annual withdrawal rate data is well above the 70% threshold. The average class fill rate for 2021-2022 was at 78%. Most notable is the full-time faculty coverage by section. At 11%, this is far below previous levels and reflects the need for more FT faculty.

Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis

Learning Outcome	Population or Course(s) Assessed	Description	Summary of Assessment Results
1. Students will demonstrate understanding and application of planning and preparation	All EDUC and CEPY AA Courses	In-class Activities Class Project Survey	Multicultural perspectives have been the backbone of our programs for over 15 years. As such, course assignments and activities have been designed to specifically address course learning objectives as they relate to multicultural perspectives. All students successfully completing EDUC coursework (specifically EDUC 1120) have demonstrated competency in this area. Additionally, a student survey was administered in the Fall of 2021 that asked students to rate their level of agreement with the extent to which the course content prepared them to meet course learning objectives. A total of 128 survey responses were collected in the five teacher education courses and students indicated an average rating of 4.39 of alignment between course learning objectives and summative assessments/assignments in the courses (with the highest rating of alignment being a 5).
2. Students will demonstrate understanding and application of classroom environment	All EDUC and CEPY AA Courses	In-class Activities Class Project Survey Clinical Practicum Evaluation	Course assignments and activities have been designed to specifically address course learning objectives as they relate to professional ethics codes of conduct. All students successfully completing EDUC coursework (specifically EDUC 1120, EDUC 1190) have demonstrated competency in this area. Students in the EDUC 1190 practicum course are also evaluated by host teachers relative to professional conduct. Students who do not meet the minimum professional expectations are not able to complete the course Additionally, a student survey was administered in the Fall of 2021 that asked students to rate their level of agreement with the extent to which the course content prepared them to meet course learning objectives. A total of 128 survey responses were collected in the five teacher education courses and students indicated an average rating of 4.39 of alignment between course learning objectives and summative assessments/assignments in the courses (with the highest rating of alignment being a 5).
3. Students will demonstrate understanding and application of classroom instruction	All EDUC and CEPY AA Courses	Class Project In-class Activities Survey	The teacher education coursework is designed to support collaboration and build collaborative learning skills. Course assignments and activities have been designed to specifically address course learning objectives as they relate to Collaboration. All students successfully completing EDUC and CEPY coursework have demonstrated competency in this area. Additionally, a student survey was administered in the Fall of 2021 that asked students to rate their level of agreement with the extent to which the course content prepared them to meet course learning objectives. A total of 128 survey responses were collected in the five teacher education courses and students indicated an average rating of 4.39 of alignment between course learning objectives and summative assessments/assignments in the courses (with the highest rating of alignment being a 5).
4. Students will demonstrate understanding and application of professional responsibilities	All EDUC and CEPY AA Courses	Clinical Practicum Evaluation Survey	All students must complete the EDUC 1190 Introduction to Education practicum where they complete 45 hours in a K-12 school setting working with a teacher and their class. Host teachers provide feedback and a formal assessment of students on a 20-item evaluation of student conduct as it relates to professional behaviors. Students who do not demonstrate competency in all areas are not able to complete the course. Additionally, a student survey was administered in the Fall of 2021 that asked students to rate their level of agreement with the extent to which the course content prepared them to meet course learning objectives. A total of 128 survey responses were collected in the five teacher education courses and students indicated an average rating of 4.39 of alignment between course learning objectives and summative assessments/assignments in the courses (with the highest rating of alignment being a 5).

Interpretation of Assessment findings
The successful complete of course assignments and activities, paired with the relatively high completion rates for courses indicates that program learning outcomes are being met through the delivered curriculum. This is particularly seen in practicum settings where students are evaluated by outside professionals with regard to program learning objectives. Student responses to the survey indicate that they perceive a high degree of alignment between course assessments and course learning objectives. In other words, they feel that the course prepared them to meet learning objectives.

Interpretation of Assessment findings

The successful complete of course assignments and activities, paired with the relatively high completion rates for courses indicates that program learning outcomes are being met through the delivered curriculum. This is particularly seen in practicum settings where students are evaluated by outside professionals with regard to program learning objectives. Student responses to the survey indicate that they perceive a high degree of alignment between course assessments and course learning objectives. In other words, they feel that the course prepared them to meet learning objectives.

Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)

Upcoming Year	Changes Planned for the upcoming year	Data Motivating this change
2021-2022	Revision of summative assessments.	Need to disaggregate learning outcomes by course.
2021-2022	Alignment of assessment with INTASC Model Core Learning Standards.	Need to align to national standards.
2021-2022

Please select all of the following that characterize the types of changes described in the above action plan

Back