Review Assessment Report
Part 1: Contact & Program Identification
Report Year and Contact Information | ||
---|---|---|
Academic Year | Modified By | Date Modified |
2021-2022 | [email protected] | 2022-10-03T20:36:29.776Z |
School | Name of Program | Courses |
---|---|---|
NPS | Nursing AAS Degree | BIOL 2225,BIOL 2310,BIOL 2310L,BIOL 2510,BIOL 2520,NMNC 1110,NMNC 1135,NMNC 1210,NMNC 1220,NMNC 1230,NMNC 1235,NMNC 2310,NMNC 2320,NMNC 2335,NMNC 2410,NMNC 2435,PSYC 2120 |
Part 2: Program Summary
Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program |
---|
CNM's nursing program has returned to in-person learning, with full clinical groups at clinical sites. In Summer 22, Level 1 students returned to long-term care settings, completing the transition to full pre-covid clinical experiences. |
Part 3: Data Review
2019-2020 | 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | |
---|---|---|---|
Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10 | 201 | 210 | 192 |
Number of declared majors | 3593 | 3317 | 2827 |
Average Class Size | 28.9 | 25.3 | 25.7 |
Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%) | 11% | 11% | 8% |
Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above | 80% | 75% | 82% |
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year | 83% | 82% | 77% |
Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schools | 14% | n/a | n/a |
Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section | 65% | 64% | 23% |
Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above |
---|
All targets met. |
Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis
Learning Outcome | Population or Course(s) Assessed | Description | Summary of Assessment Results |
---|---|---|---|
GLO – 1 Integrate diverse patient values, beliefs, and attitudes into plan of care for patients with chronic illness | Students in NMNC 2435 and 2445 |
| 79.63% of students have passed the threshold of 825 on the specific topics that apply to this GLO on the HESI exit exam.
98.5% of students also met Satisfactory or Exceeds Expectations on each outcome/competency on clinical summative evaluations. |
GLO – 2 Interpret and analyze factors and system contributions that impact the quality and safety of nursing practice | Students in NMNC 2435 and 2445 |
| 77.78% of students have passed the threshold of 825 on the specific topics that apply to this GLO on the HESI exit exam.
98.5% of students also met Satisfactory or Exceeds Expectations on each outcome/competency on clinical summative evaluations. |
GLO – 3 Integrate an evidence-based approach in the delivery and evaluation of nursing care to acutely ill patients across the lifespan | Students in NMNC 2435 and 2445 |
| 77.78% of students have passed the threshold of 825 on the specific topics that apply to this GLO on the HESI exit exam.
98.5% of students also met Satisfactory or Exceeds Expectations on each outcome/competency on clinical summative evaluations. |
GLO – 4 Evaluate the use of policies and procedures within the acute care setting | Students in NMNC 2435 and 2445 |
| 82.41% of students have passed the threshold of 825 on the specific topics that apply to this GLO on the HESI exit exam.
98.5% of students also met Satisfactory or Exceeds Expectations on each outcome/competency on clinical summative evaluations. |
GLO – 5 Effectively collaborate with the healthcare team in the delivery of patient care | Students in NMNC 2435 and 2445 |
| 81.02% of students have passed the threshold of 825 on the specific topics that apply to this GLO on the HESI exit exam.
98.5% of students also met Satisfactory or Exceeds Expectations on each outcome/competency on clinical summative evaluations. |
GLO – 6 Integrate use of appropriate technology for the delivery of nursing care to acutely ill patients | Students in NMNC 2435 and 2445 |
| 68.06% of students have passed the threshold of 825 on the specific topics that apply to this GLO on the HESI exit exam.
98.5% of students also met Satisfactory or Exceeds Expectations on each outcome/competency on clinical summative evaluations. |
Interpretation of Assessment findings |
---|
GLOs reflect HESI exit exam scores in specific categories relating to the specific learning outcome. Only categories with a question n value of greater than 30 have been chosen in order to provide statistically valid data. The exception is GLO 6, technology, as there are very limited numbers of categories available within the HESI E2 Exit exam for evaluation. The data is less statistically valid because of the low question n values, so the ELA is set to 65%. Number of students at threshold is used as the criterion due to the group effect of using cumulative averages.
The average score across all categories is uniformly above the 825 threshold that has been associated with student success on NCLEX, so identifying individual scores provides much more actionable data. Students are meeting this standard at rates higher than 75% (GLOs 1-5) or 65% (GLO 6) in both objective (HESI exam scores) and subjective (clinical summative evaluations) criteria.
Outcomes are within expected levels of achievement. |
Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)
Upcoming Year | Changes Planned for the upcoming year | Data Motivating this change |
---|---|---|
2021-2022 | ||
2021-2022 | ||
2021-2022 |