Review Assessment Report
Part 1: Contact & Program Identification
| Report Year and Contact Information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Academic Year | Modified By | Date Modified |
| 2022-2023 | jprice54@cnm.edu | 2023-10-16T20:05:48.847Z |
| School | Name of Program | Courses |
|---|---|---|
| HWPS | Phlebotomy Certificate | HLTH 1001,MLT 1001,PHLB 1010,PHLB 1090,PHLB 1092 |
Part 2: Program Summary
| Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program |
|---|
In contrast to previous year, course fill rates have declined. Changes to course schedules were implemented to monitor if completion of certificate in one-term increases enrollment.
Program continues to face supply chain issues. High demand makes continuity of supplies difficult. |
Part 3: Data Review
| 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | 2022-2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10 | 60 | 80 | 81 |
| Number of declared majors | 105 | 112 | 66 |
| Average Class Size | 21.5 | 21.1 | 22.3 |
| Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%) | 8% | 8% | 8% |
| Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above | 86% | 85% | 86% |
| Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year | 82% | 78% | 81% |
| Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schools | 8% | n/a | n/a |
| Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section | 31% | 43% | 13% |
| Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above |
|---|
Phlebotomy program has met all targets. Declared majors shows sharp decline which is consistent with decreased enrollment. Students continue to achieve high pass rates. |
Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis
| Learning Outcome | Population or Course(s) Assessed | Description | Summary of Assessment Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Describe and demonstrate appropriate laboratory etiquette, professionalism, communication and human relation skills. | MLT 1001 and PHLB 1090 |
| Criteria: Professionalism Paper
Mean score <71%= unacceptable, action plan required
Mean score >71%= acceptable, no action plan needed
Average: 79%
Criteria: Clinical Performance Preceptor Evaluations
Mean score <71%= unacceptable, action plan required
Mean score >71%= acceptable, no action plan needed
Average: 96% |
| 2. Describe and identify pre-analytical variables and interferences related to laboratory specimen collection and handling and correlate laboratory tests with basic human physiology and disease states. | PHLB 1010 and ASCP PBT National Exam |
| Criteria: PHLB 1010 comprehensive final exam
Mean score <71%= unacceptable, action plan required
Mean score >71%= acceptable, no action plan needed
Average Score: 80%
Criteria: ASCP PHLB scores
Mean score <400= unacceptable, action plan required
Mean score >400= acceptable, no action plan needed
Average Score: 569 |
| 3. Perform laboratory procedures including: specimen collection and processing, record documentation, pre-analytical preventative and corrective action, and safety protocols. | PHLB 1092 and PHLB 1090 |
| Criteria: Lab practical exam and final draw scores
Mean score <71%=unacceptable, action plan required
Mean score >71%= acceptable, no action plan needed
Average: 83%
Criteria: Clinical Performance Instructor Evaluations
Mean score <71%=unacceptable, action plan required
Mean score >71%=acceptable, no action plan needed
Average: 96% |
| Interpretation of Assessment findings |
|---|
Knowledge: Students are meeting and exceeding the minimum criteria. The final comprehensive exam is maintaining a greater than C average. All students who took the
ASCP exam passed.
Skills: Students are meeting and exceeding the minimum criteria. The lab practicum and final draw scores are maintaining a greater than C average. Student performance in
clinical sites is maintaining a greater than C average.
Behavior: Students are meeting and exceeding the minimum criteria. The professionalism paper indicates students have an understanding of what it means to succeed and
display professionalism. Clinical preceptor evaluations indicate students are displaying professionalism in at the clinical sites. |
Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)
| Upcoming Year | Changes Planned for the upcoming year | Data Motivating this change |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-2023 | ||
| 2022-2023 | ||
| 2022-2023 |