Review Assessment Report
Part 1: Contact & Program Identification
| Report Year and Contact Information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Academic Year | Modified By | Date Modified |
| 2022-2023 | [email protected] | 2023-10-05T17:05:22.575Z |
| School | Name of Program | Courses |
|---|---|---|
| MSE | NUTR Science Gen Ed | NUTR 1010,NUTR 1010L,NUTR 2110 |
Part 2: Program Summary
| Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program |
|---|
Program highlights include adding an Attend Anywhere course to the Nutrition schedule. The Nutrition program also offered two Nutrition Students Mixer/Meetings via Zoom, both in Fall and Spring. Students were able to meet CNM and UNM Nutrition faculty as well as become connected with other Nutrition majors and ask questions/gain information about future study and careers in the field. Nutrition faculty also participated in College Day to bring awareness to our programs.
Challenges included the the lack of enrollment in face to face courses, which resulted in canceling some of them before the start of term. Another challenge was the continued lower enrollment CNM-wide, which limited course offerings and part time instruction. Also, one of the Nutrition full-time instructors retired at the end of Spring 2023.
|
Part 3: Data Review
| 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | 2022-2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Number of declared majors | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Average Class Size | 24.9 | 21.4 | 21.7 |
| Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%) | 9% | 10% | 8% |
| Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above | 81% | 80% | 79% |
| Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year | 83% | 73% | 75% |
| Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schools | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section | 72% | 57% | 32% |
| Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above |
|---|
All target measures were met, exceeding goals in each of the required categories. |
Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis
| Learning Outcome | Population or Course(s) Assessed | Description | Summary of Assessment Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| ES Critical Thinking: Evidence Evaluation – evaluate evidence/data for credibility (e.g., bias, reliability, validity), probable truth, and relevance to a situation. | NUTR 1010L |
| A common assignment on evaluating nutrition information on the internet was used to assess proficiency. Target was a minimum score of 75%. Average across the 8 NUTR 1010L courses reported over Fall 2022 to Spring 2023 was 95.4%. |
| ES Critical Thinking: Reasoning/Conclusion – develop conclusions, solutions, and outcomes that reflect an informed, well-reasoned evaluation | NUTR 1010 |
| A common assignment on developing an experiment using the scientific method was used to assess proficiency. Target was a minimum score of 75%. Average across the 16 NUTR 1010 courses reported over Fall 2022 to Spring 2023 was 87.8%. |
| 2e. Civic discourse, civic knowledge and engagement - local and global | NUTR 1010L |
| A common quiz on the local water supply was used to assess proficiency. Target was a minimum score of 75%. Average across the 8 NUTR 1010L courses reported over Fall 2022 to Spring 2023 was 90.7%. |
| 2b. Sustainability and the natural and human worlds | NUTR 1010 |
| A common assignment on Sustainability via was used to assess proficiency. Target was a minimum score of 75%. Average across the 16 NUTR 1010 courses reported over Fall 2022 to Spring 2023 was 93.1%. |
| Interpretation of Assessment findings |
|---|
Students demonstrated a high level of proficiency in all learning outcomes assessed. |
Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)
| Upcoming Year | Changes Planned for the upcoming year | Data Motivating this change |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-2023 | ||
| 2022-2023 | ||
| 2022-2023 |