Review Assessment Report

Part 1: Contact & Program Identification

Report Year and Contact Information
Academic YearModified ByDate Modified
2022-2023[email protected]2023-10-19T19:37:32.501Z
SchoolName of ProgramCourses
MSEMATH Mathematics Gen EdMATH 1130,MATH 1140,MATH 1220,MATH 1220P,MATH 1350,MATH 1350P,MATH 2110,Math 1230,Math 1240,Math 1250,Math 1430,Math 1440,Math 1510,Math 1520,Math 2410,Math 2420,Math 2530

Part 2: Program Summary

Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program
CNM Moved a considerable number of general ed mathematics courses to the online format due to enrollment reasons. Many of the classes in this program use Resondus monitoring software to proctor student test taking. This year, the assessment was collected via an in-person final exam in a proctored environment.

Part 3: Data Review

2020-20212021-20222022-2023
Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10n/an/an/a
Number of declared majorsn/an/an/a
Average Class Size22.420.420.5
Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%)20%20%20%
Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above58%56%55%
Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year77%68%70%
Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schoolsn/an/an/a
Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section42%35%22%
Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above
The C pass rate has fallen under the 60% threshold (55%) and has been a trend since 2020-2021 school year. There may be a variety of causes for this trend including the aftermath of the covid-19 shutdown which includes both the student's homework practices and a reliance on watching videos to gain familiarity with the material without practicing it in a test-like environment. The mathematics department is aware of this decline and plan on addressing some remedy to this decline in the Spring semester of 2024.

Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis

Learning OutcomePopulation or Course(s) AssessedDescriptionSummary of Assessment Results
1c. Communication: Evaluation and Production of Arguments
Math 1140 Geometry for Design
    Interpretation of Assessment findings
    Math 1140 – Geometry for Design AY2022/23 through the use of two assessment questions embedded in the final exam. The questions were scored on the scale {0, 1, 2, 3} with rubric 0 = “Not answered or nonsense response”; 1 = “An attempt was made, but had a significant error”; 2 = “An attempt was made, but had minor a error”; 3 = “correctly answered”. . The MATH 1140 course-level student learning outcomes: Use construction tools of descriptive geometry: explain how to bisect a line segment with a compass and straight edge (mean = 1.83), and Identify linear and planar symmetries: describe the symmetry (reflection, rotation, or no symmetry) (mean = 2.05) of the sigils: A, D, Z, H, and R suggests may have difficulty writing out consecutive steps of a process.

    Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)

    Upcoming YearChanges Planned for the upcoming yearData Motivating this change
    2022-2023
    2022-2023
    2022-2023
    Please select all of the following that characterize the types of changes described in the above action plan
    2021-2024 CNM - Digital Services
    Site version v1.0.62 built at 2024-02-01T17:31:19.000Z