Review Assessment Report
Part 1: Contact & Program Identification
| Report Year and Contact Information | ||
|---|---|---|
| Academic Year | Modified By | Date Modified |
| 2022-2023 | jbeltran6@cnm.edu | 2023-10-10T17:42:31.067Z |
| School | Name of Program | Courses |
|---|---|---|
| AT | Geographic Information Technology AAS Degree | BCIS 1110,CAD 1001,CIS 1250,CIS 2520,GEOG 1110,GEOG 2110,GIS 1002,GIS 1005,GIS 1008,GIS 1118,GIS 2008,GIS 2011,GIS 2020,GIS 2228,MATH 1350,SUR 1002,SUR 2205 |
Part 2: Program Summary
| Provide a high level review of the program to include highlights, successes, challenges, significant changes, and significant resources needed to support the program |
|---|
full return to classroom time has been good. Overall, program continues to have students that express satisfaction and eagerness with and for the program but overall enrollment is low, along with graduation numbers. |
Part 3: Data Review
| 2020-2021 | 2021-2022 | 2022-2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual number of graduate awards is greater than 10 | 10 | 4 | 2 |
| Number of declared majors | 38 | 44 | 36 |
| Average Class Size | 21.3 | 20.1 | 19.9 |
| Annual Average Class withdrawal rate is 30% or below (SAGE 35%) | 17% | 16% | 15% |
| Annual C-Pass rate for coursework is 60% or above | 65% | 65% | 65% |
| Average class fill rate at 60% or above capacity within a term or over a year | 76% | 71% | 71% |
| Graduate Transfer to 4-year Schools | 20% | n/a | n/a |
| Full-time Faculty Coverage by Section | 50% | 50% | 21% |
| Summarize how your program met or did not meet the target measures based on the data above |
|---|
Average class fill rate met
retention rate at 85% or higher
C pass rate at 65%
Number of grads greater than 10 not met, and has gotten lower over the last 2 year period. COVID had its part to play in this. We are currently working to increase these numbers. |
Part 4: Program Learning Outcome Analysis
| Learning Outcome | Population or Course(s) Assessed | Description | Summary of Assessment Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Communicate results of GIS-based research to technical and non-technical audiences. | GIS 2228 |
| students required to produce a spatial data layout poster, to convey results from spatial analysis to a general audience. Students are graded on project work as well as data visualization/presentation.
14/15 submitted projects received a 70% or greater. 13/15 received an 80% or greater. |
| 1. Communicate results of GIS-based research to technical and non-technical audiences. | GIS 2228 |
| students required to produce a spatial data layout poster, to convey results from spatial analysis to a general audience. Students are graded on project work as well as data visualization/presentation.
14/15 submitted projects received a 70% or greater. 13/15 received an 80% or greater. |
| Interpretation of Assessment findings |
|---|
assessment findings indicate current curriculum working well. |
Part 5: Additional Action Plan in Support of Student Learning (If Appropriate)
| Upcoming Year | Changes Planned for the upcoming year | Data Motivating this change |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-2023 | changes planned include updating lab content to more accurately reflect current software. | none, current data indicates success. but industry changes dictate otherwise |
| 2022-2023 | ||
| 2022-2023 |