Archived Assessment Report

ProgramSOCI Social Behavioral Gen Ed
Assessment Reporter[email protected]
ThemePracticing Community
Review Year
2024-2025 - Midpoint Report

Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill)Focus Area
3a. Personal and Social Responsibility: Intercultural reasoning and intercultural competenceAre 65% of our Gen Ed students able to demonstrate intercultural reasoning and intercultural competence?
3b. Personal and Social Responsibility: Sustainability and the natural and human worldsN/A
3c. Personal and Social Responsibility: Ethical ReasoningN/A
3d. Personal and Social Responsibility: Collaboration skills, teamwork and value systemsN/A
3e. Personal and Social Responsibility: Civic discourse, civic knowledge and engagement – local and globalAre 65% of our Gen Ed students able to demonstrate civic discourse, civic knowledge and engagement - local and global.

Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill)Description of Assessment ToolPopulation or Courses AssessedHypothetical Analysis/Target
3a. Personal and Social Responsibility: Intercultural reasoning and intercultural competenceScenarios that allow students to write a response to the scenario, demonstrating their intercultural reasoning and intercultural competenceSOCI1110This is still being sorted out
3b. Personal and Social Responsibility: Sustainability and the natural and human worldsN/AN/AN/A
3c. Personal and Social Responsibility: Ethical ReasoningN/AN/AN/A
3d. Personal and Social Responsibility: Collaboration skills, teamwork and value systemsN/AN/AN/A
3e. Personal and Social Responsibility: Civic discourse, civic knowledge and engagement – local and globalScenarios asking students to respond to the scenario to demonstrate their competency in civic discourse, civic knowledge and engagementSOCI1110Still sorting this out

Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill)Summary of ResultsReflection on Focus AreaIntepretation of Results
3a. Personal and Social Responsibility: Intercultural reasoning and intercultural competenceUsing a likert scale between 1-4, we considered (3) developing) and (4) proficient. 50% of our students No, we did not hit 65%, but we are close We have some improvements to make to increase our proficient and developing students
3b. Personal and Social Responsibility: Sustainability and the natural and human worldsNANANA
3c. Personal and Social Responsibility: Ethical ReasoningNANANA
3d. Personal and Social Responsibility: Collaboration skills, teamwork and value systemsNANANA
3e. Personal and Social Responsibility: Civic discourse, civic knowledge and engagement – local and globalNANANA

3a. Personal and Social Responsibility: Intercultural reasoning and intercultural competence
Describe the change that was implemented.We are changing the wording in our instructions to better align assignment outcomes with the goal.
Type of Change
  • Grading Methodology Changes
  • Assignment Revision
Change in Assessment Approach or Tools?The tools. We are clarifying the instructions, rubric, and expectations.
What data motivated the change?We did not meet our desired 65% proficiency
Hypothesis about the effect the change will have?Students will have a more clear understanding of expectations.
3b. Personal and Social Responsibility: Sustainability and the natural and human worlds
Describe the change that was implemented.NA
Type of Change
  • Other
Change in Assessment Approach or Tools?NA
What data motivated the change?NA
Hypothesis about the effect the change will have?NA
3c. Personal and Social Responsibility: Ethical Reasoning
Describe the change that was implemented.NA
Type of Change
  • Other
Change in Assessment Approach or Tools?NA
What data motivated the change?NA
Hypothesis about the effect the change will have?NA
3d. Personal and Social Responsibility: Collaboration skills, teamwork and value systems
Describe the change that was implemented.NA
Type of Change
  • Other
Change in Assessment Approach or Tools?NA
What data motivated the change?NA
Hypothesis about the effect the change will have?NA
3e. Personal and Social Responsibility: Civic discourse, civic knowledge and engagement – local and global
Describe the change that was implemented.NA
Type of Change
  • Other
Change in Assessment Approach or Tools?NA
What data motivated the change?NA
Hypothesis about the effect the change will have?NA

Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill)Description of Assessment ToolPopulation of Courses Assessed
3a. Personal and Social Responsibility: Intercultural reasoning and intercultural competenceSame tool but with clarified directionsSOCI1110
3b. Personal and Social Responsibility: Sustainability and the natural and human worldsNANA
3c. Personal and Social Responsibility: Ethical ReasoningNANA
3d. Personal and Social Responsibility: Collaboration skills, teamwork and value systemsNANA
3e. Personal and Social Responsibility: Civic discourse, civic knowledge and engagement – local and globalNANA

Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill)Summary of Second
Round Results
Intepretation of Results,
Pre- and Post-Change
Follow up questions,
possible next steps

Describe any change in student achievement observed as part of this assessment process, and what led to those changes.

Describe long-term changes in the program(s) that the assessment process led to, and what motivated those changes?

What did you learn about the teaching and learning of "Practicing Community" in your programs?

Describe any external factors affecting the program or affecting assessment of the program.

2021-2024 CNM - Digital Services
Site version v1.0.74 built at 2025-02-10T20:05:33.000Z