Archived Assessment Report
Program | Substance Abuse Counselor Certificate |
Assessment Reporter | [email protected] |
Theme | Practicing Community |
Review Year | 2024-2025 - Midpoint Report |
Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill) | Focus Area |
---|---|
4. Demonstrate nondiscriminatory responsiveness appropriate to working with culturally diverse individuals. | Will students adhere to the social work code of ethics? |
Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill) | Description of Assessment Tool | Population or Courses Assessed | Hypothetical Analysis/Target |
---|---|---|---|
4. Demonstrate nondiscriminatory responsiveness appropriate to working with culturally diverse individuals. | pre and post internship evaluations | HMSV 2990 | Students will increase their performance as clinicians from pre to post evaluation 100% of the time. |
Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill) | Summary of Results | Reflection on Focus Area | Intepretation of Results |
---|---|---|---|
4. Demonstrate nondiscriminatory responsiveness appropriate to working with culturally diverse individuals. | 90% of students increased their performance (based on the pre and post practicum assessment). This shows valued improvement in the agency that will directly translate to another site when the student is employed in the field. | The results are a direct relationship to what was taught in the course, to the real experiential learning that happened at the site. | This shows that this course is on target in providing a well rounded agency experience and real life preview on what to expect an agency. |
Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill) | Description of Assessment Tool | Population of Courses Assessed |
---|
Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill) | Summary of Second Round Results | Intepretation of Results, Pre- and Post-Change | Follow up questions, possible next steps |
---|
Describe any change in student achievement observed as part of this assessment process, and what led to those changes.
Describe long-term changes in the program(s) that the assessment process led to, and what motivated those changes?
What did you learn about the teaching and learning of "Practicing Community" in your programs?
Describe any external factors affecting the program or affecting assessment of the program.