Archived Assessment Report
| Program | CSCI Flex Gen Ed |
| Assessment Reporter | [email protected] |
| Theme | Practicing Community |
| Review Year | 2024-2025 - Final Report |
| Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill) | Focus Area |
|---|---|
| 3a. Quantitative Reasoning: Communication/Representation of Quantitative Information | Can students communicate and present quantitative information? |
| Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill) | Description of Assessment Tool | Population or Courses Assessed | Hypothetical Analysis/Target |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3a. Quantitative Reasoning: Communication/Representation of Quantitative Information | Brightspace Quiz (Final Exam) | CSCI 1108 Intro to Computer Modeling | 70% of students score 70% or higher. |
| Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill) | Summary of Results | Reflection on Focus Area | Intepretation of Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3a. Quantitative Reasoning: Communication/Representation of Quantitative Information | 92% of students scored 70% or higher on the CSCI 1108 Final Exam. The average grade was an 86% and the median was 92%. Zeros and incompletes were not included. | Yes, assessment questions were written to assess student ability to communicate about quantitative information. | Results show that students are understanding the material to the desired degree. |
| 3a. Quantitative Reasoning: Communication/Representation of Quantitative Information | |
|---|---|
| Describe the change that was implemented. | The department is currently exceeding its goal. No changes are planned at this time. |
| Type of Change |
|
| Change in Assessment Approach or Tools? | No, it will not. |
| What data motivated the change? | Final exam averages were in the A to B range, quite high, with few low outliers. Average: 86. Median: 92. 92% of students scored 70% or above. This could be due to high course attrition weeding out students prior to the final exam. |
| Hypothesis about the effect the change will have? | No changes are planned at this time. This course attracts a broad swath of students, many of whom might not otherwise take a computer science course and may not take one again. We want this course to both teach quantitative reasoning and communication skills, as well as a attract students who were not previously considering computer science. High attrition rates are expected in introductory courses that are highly technical such as this one. |
| Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill) | Description of Assessment Tool | Population of Courses Assessed |
|---|---|---|
| 3a. Quantitative Reasoning: Communication/Representation of Quantitative Information | Final exam | CSCI 1108 Intro to Computer Modeling |
| Learning Outcome (or Gen Ed Essential Skill) | Summary of Second Round Results | Intepretation of Results, Pre- and Post-Change | Follow up questions, possible next steps |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3a. Quantitative Reasoning: Communication/Representation of Quantitative Information | 85% of students scored 70% or higher on the CSCI 1108 Final Exam. The average grade was an 82% and the median was 90%. Zeros and incompletes were not included. | We need to continue monitoring to make sure we are meeting our goals, however, large changes are planned for this course. The intent is to switch entirely from Netlogo to Python in the next year to year and a half. Learning outcomes remain the same, but this shift will likely have a large impact on students (hopefully for the better). But this also means that the assessment tool (in this case the final exam) will be dramatically altered. |
Describe any change in student achievement observed as part of this assessment process, and what led to those changes.
We need to continue monitoring to make sure we are meeting our goals, however, large changes are planned for this course. The intent is to switch entirely from Netlogo to Python in the next year to year and a half. Learning outcomes remain the same, but this shift will likely have a large impact on students (hopefully for the better). But this also means that the assessment tool (in this case the final exam) will be dramatically altered.
Describe long-term changes in the program(s) that the assessment process led to, and what motivated those changes?
The percentage of students scoring 70% or higher dropped from 92% to 85%. This is not the trend we want to see, but it is still meeting our goals. Since no particular changes were made to the course, these fluctuations could be due to factors outside our control.
What did you learn about the teaching and learning of "Practicing Community" in your programs?
85% of students scored 70% or higher on the CSCI 1108 Final Exam. The average grade was an 82% and the median was 90%. Zeros and incompletes were not included
Describe any external factors affecting the program or affecting assessment of the program.
None